How do Georgia malpractice attorneys evaluate emergency care claims?

Last updated: November 7, 2026. Georgia law changes; check the date before relying on any deadline or rule below.

Before anything else, a Georgia emergency care evaluation asks whether the gross negligence statute applies. For emergency medical care in a hospital emergency department, an obstetrical unit, or a surgical suite immediately following emergency department care, the patient must prove gross negligence by clear and convincing evidence (O.C.G.A. § 51-1-29.5). If the statute applies, the evaluation asks whether the facts show far more than an ordinary mistake.

Step 1: Is it “emergency medical care” in a covered setting?

• Where was the care given? Only a hospital emergency department, an obstetrical unit, or a surgical suite immediately after ED care is covered.
• Was it a bona fide emergency? The statute covers care after onset of a condition with acute symptoms of sufficient severity.
• Had the patient been stabilized? Care after stabilization, when the patient could be treated as a nonemergency patient, is excluded.
• Was the care related to the original emergency? Unrelated care is excluded.

A freestanding urgent care clinic is not a hospital emergency department. Care there is judged by the ordinary standard in § 51-1-27.

Step 2: If covered, is there gross negligence?

The attorney looks for facts that go beyond an error in judgment under pressure, such as:

• a critical test result or warning sign documented and disregarded;
• a patient with clear danger signs discharged without evaluation;
• a failure to perform a basic, required step that careful emergency providers treat as routine.

The jury will be instructed to consider whether the provider had or could obtain the patient’s history, whether there was a preexisting relationship, the circumstances of the emergency, and the circumstances of the care (§ 51-1-29.5(d)). The attorney weighs how those factors will look to a jury.

Step 3: If not covered, apply the ordinary standard

If the care occurred after stabilization, outside the covered settings, or was unrelated to the emergency, the claim is measured by the care ordinarily employed by the profession generally under similar circumstances (§ 51-1-27). “Similar circumstances” includes the resources actually available; Georgia does not use a local standard (McDaniel v. Hendrix, 1991).

Step 4: Causation, experts, and deadlines

• Causation. The failure must more likely than not have caused the injury (Zwiren v. Thompson, 2003).
• Experts. An emergency medicine expert, and, where needed, a specialist on causation, who meet § 24-7-702.
• Affidavit. Filed with the complaint (§ 9-11-9.1).
• Deadline. Two years from the injury, five years from the act (§ 9-3-71).

Step 5: Who is responsible

Emergency physicians may be employed by a staffing group rather than the hospital. The hospital answers for them only through employment or apparent agency, which requires holding out and justifiable reliance (Richmond County Hospital Authority v. Brown, 1987). Emergency nurses may be hospital employees. Fault is apportioned among all of them (§ 51-12-33).

Request the emergency record with its time stamps

Request the emergency department record with its time stamps, triage notes, and discharge instructions. The time stamps show when you were stabilized, which is one of the first questions an attorney will ask.

---

This article explains Georgia law in general terms. It is not legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Deadlines in malpractice cases are short and fact-specific, so talk to a Georgia lawyer about your own situation.

---