If medical monitoring claims are denied, plaintiffs who cannot afford testing may lose valuable treatment time. In its decision filed on December 31, 2014, the Supreme Court of the State of Nevada (“Nevada Supreme Court”) held that plaintiff may state cause of action for negligence with medical monitoring as the remedy without asserting that he or she has suffered present physical injury, noting that if medical monitoring claims are denied, plaintiffs who cannot afford testing may, through no fault of their own, be left to wait until their symptoms become manifest, losing valuable treatment time.
Nevada Monitoring Claims In Medical Malpractice Cases
https://medicalmalpracticelawyers.com/nevada-supre…
…