Summary of Plaintiff’s Allegations Over seven year period, during which girl went for regular biannual visits to the Children’s Dental Office, she took three panoramic x-rays. Each of the three x-rays showed signs of obstruction to upper canine eruption on both sides, and bilateral retention of upper primary canines. After consulting two orthodontists and an oral surgeon, it was determined that the girl would have to have her two upper impacted canines extracted and have dental implants placed once she was fully grown. If the girl’s primary (baby) canine teeth had been removed earlier, her adult teeth could have come in normally.
Children’s Dental Office Malpractice Lawsuit
https://malpracticecases.millerandzois.com/impacte…
…