Prior to beginning her treatment, Charlton presented Ragsdale an informed consent document to sign, which identified risks associated with chiropractic care including “sprain/strain injuries, irritation of disc condition, and rarely, fractures. Charlton moved for summary judgment, arguing fractures are known risk of chiropractic treatment and may occur without negligence. The Missouri Court of Appeals Fourth District (“Missouri appellate court”) stated in its opinion filed on May 14, 2024: “Viewed in the light most favorable to Ragsdale, the record shows there were genuine issues of material fact precluding the entry of summary judgment. Chiropractor testified that when the diversified treatment is applied properly, there is limited pressure on the ribs.
Missouri Appellate Court Reinstates Malpractice Case Against Chiropractor – Medical Malpractice Lawyers
https://medicalmalpracticelawyers.com/missouri-app…
…